Evaluation of the forensic efficiency of ChrX markers the population under investigationThis function provides information on the power of forensic analysis using the respective markers. Formulae are listed in the table. Two of the parameters listed, namely the polymorphism information content (PIC) [1] and the expected heterozygosity (Het) [2], have been devised for more general purposes and are valid for both AS and ChrX markers. The mean exclusion chance (MECKRÜ) was introduced by Krueger et al. [3] for AS markers typed in trios involving mother, child and putative father (formula I). This parameter is not suitable for ChrX markers except for deficiency cases in which the paternal grandmother is investigated instead of the alleged father. Kishida et al. [4] devised a MECKIS for ChrX markers which covers trios including a daughter (formula II). If MECKRÜ is compared to MECKIS, the latter is considerably larger. This highlights the fact that in trios involving a daughter, ChrX markers are more efficient than AS markers. Finally, Desmarais et al. [5] introduced formulae for the mean exclusion chance of ChrX markers in trios involving daughters (formula III) and in father/daughter duos lacking maternal genotype information (formula IV). MEC(III) is equivalent to MEC(II) whilst MEC(IV) is also appropriate for maternity testing of mother/son duos. PDM and PD Fare parameters suitable to evaluate the power of the markers for forensic identification purposes in males and females, respectively.
![]() I. MEC (mean exclusion chance) for AS markers in trios II. MEC for ChrX markers in trios involving daughters III. MEC for ChrX markers in trios involving daughters (Desmarais version) IV. MEC for ChrX markers in father/daugther dous V. Power of discrimination (PD) in females VI. PD for ChrX markers in males fi (fj). population frequency of the ith (jth) marker allele |
NewsLast updates:• DXS9908 (DXS7127) • DXS6795 • DXS6803 • DXS10103 • DXS8378 StatisticsPopulations: 44Marker: 55 Allele frequencies: 2855
|
|||